Menu Close

Dentistry Without Mercury

By Sam Ziff and Michael F. Ziff, D.D.S.

Summary: A health information book to answer questions you might have on why there should be Dentistry Without Mercury. Exposure to mercury can cause serious health issues, especially endangering children and fetuses. A variety of illnesses, including Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis, have been associated with mercury. Research shows that more than 67 million Americans aged two years and older exceed the intake of mercury vapor considered “safe” by the U.S. EPA due to the presence of dental amalgam fillings in their mouths. Find out more in Dentistry Without Mercury.

References:

  1. World Health Organization. Mercury in Health Care [policy paper]. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; August 2005. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/medicalwaste/mercurypolpaper.pdf.
  2. Health Canada. The Safety of Dental Amalgam. Ottawa, Ontario: Minister of Health; 1996.
  3. Reuters/PRNewire-USNewswire Online. Dental mercury use banned in Norway, Sweden and Denmark because composites are adequate replacements [press release]. January 3, 2008.
  4. Orthomolecular Medicine News Service. Mercury dental amalgams banned in 3 countries: FDA, EPA, ADA still allow and encourage heavy-metal fillings [press release]. November 20, 2008. http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/c04n24.shtml.
  5. Health and Environment Alliance. Mercury and Dental Amalgams [fact sheet]. Brussels, Belgium: Health and Environment Alliance and Health Care without Harm; May 2007: 3. http://env-health.org/IMG/pdf/HEA_009-07.pdf
  6. United Nations Environment Programme. Minamata Convention on Mercury. Geneva, Switzerland: Text agreed upon in UNEP(DITE)/Hg/INC.5/3; January 13-19, 2013. http://www.mercuryconvention.org/Portals/11/documents/conventionText/Minamata%20Conventio%20on%20Mercury_e.pdf
  7. Dental Board of California. The Facts about Fillings [fact sheet]. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Consumer Affairs; 5/04. http://www.dbc.ca.gov/formspubs/pub_dmfs_english_webview.pdf
  8. State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. Fillings: The Choices You Have: Mercury Amalgam and Other Filling Materials [brochure]. Hartford, CT:DEP; May 2011. http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/mercury/gen_info/fillings_brochure.pdf.
  9. Maine Bureau of Health. Filling Materials [brochure]. Augusta, ME: Bureau of Health, 2002. http://www.vce.org/mercury/Maine_AmalBrocheFinal2.pdf
  10. Advisory Committee on Mercury Pollution. Dental Amalgam Fillings: Environmental and Health Facts for Dental Patients [brochure]. Waterbury, Vermont: Mercury Education and Reduction Campaign. http://www.mercvt.org/PDF/DentalAmalgamFactSheet.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2013.
  11. Richardson GM, Wilson R, Allard D, Purtill C, Douma S, Graviѐre, J. Mercury exposure and risks from dental amalgam in the US population, post-2000. Science of the Total Environment. 2011; 409(20):4257-4268.
  12. Hahn LJ, Kloiber R, Vimy MJ, Takahashi Y, Lorscheider F. Dental “silver” tooth fillings: a source of mercury exposure revealed by whole-body image scan and tissue analysis. FASEB J. 1989; 3(14):2641-2646.
  13. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Serial measurements of intra-oral air mercury: estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam. J Dent Res. 1985; 64(8):1072-5.
  14. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Clinical science intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam. J Den Res. 1985; 64(8):1069-71.
  15. Weiner JA, Nylander M, Berglund F. Does mercury from amalgam restorations constitute a health hazard? Sci Total Environ. 1990: 99(1-2):1-22.
  16. Richardson GM, Brecher RW, Scobie H, Hamblen J, Samuelian J, Smith C. Mercury vapour (Hg(0)): Continuing toxicological uncertainties, and establishing a Canadian reference exposure level. Regul Toxicol Pharmicol. February 2009; 53(1):32-38.
  17. Richardson GM. Inhalation of mercury-contaminated particulate matter by dentists: an overlooked occupational risk. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 2003; 9(6):1519-1531.
  18. Snapp KR, Svare CW, Peterson LD. Contribution of dental amalgams to blood mercury levels. J Dent Res. 1981; 65(special issue):311, Abstract #1276.
  19. Nimmo A, Werley MS, Martin JS, Tansy MF. Particulate inhalation during the removal of amalgam restorations. J Prosth Dent. 1990; 63(2):228-33.
  20. Reinhardt JW. Side-effects: Mercury contribution to body burden from dental amalgam. Adv Dent Res. 1992; 6(1):110-3.
  21. Stonehouse CA, Newman AP. Mercury vapour release from a dental aspirator. Br Dent J. 2001; 190(10):558-560.
  22. Gay DD, Cox RD, Reinhardt JW: Chewing releases mercury from fillings. Lancet. 1979; 313(8123):985-6.
  23. Krausβ, P., M. Deyhle, K. H. Maier, E. Roller, H. D. Weiβ, and Ph Clédon. Field study on the mercury content of saliva. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry. 1997; 63, (1-4):29-46.
  24. Isacsson G, Barregard L, Selden A, Bodin L. Impact of nocturnal bruxism on mercury uptake from dental amalgams. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997; 105(3):251-7.
  25. Sallsten G, Thoren J, Barregard L, Schutz A, Skarping G. Long-term use of nicotine chewing gum and mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings. J Dent Res. 1996; 75(1):594-8.
  26. Björkman L, Lind B. Factors influencing mercury evaporation rate from dental amalgam fillings. Scand J Dent Res. 1992; 100(6):354-60.
  27. Richardson GM. Inhalation of mercury-contaminated particulate matter by dentists: an overlooked occupational risk. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 2003; 9(6): 1519-1531.
  28. Health Canada. The Safety of Dental Amalgam. Ottawa, Ontario: Minister of Health: 1996.
  29. Sandborgh-Englund G, Elinder CG, Langworth S, Schutz A, Ekstrand J. Mercury in biological fluids after amalgam removal. J Dent Res. 1998; 77(4):615-24.
  30. Nimmo A, Werley MS, Martin JS, Tansy MF. Particulate inhalation during the removal of amalgam restorations. J Prosth Dent. 1990; 63(2):228-33.
  31. Skare I. Mercury exposure from amalgam: a background study National Board of Occupational Safety and Health. S-17184 Solna, Sweden. Abstr Scand Occup Hygiene Meet. Iceland. 1987.
  32. Richardson GM, Wilson R, Allard D, Purtill C, Douma S, Gravière J. Mercury exposure and risks from dental amalgam in the US population, post-2000. Science of the Total Environment. 2011; 409(20):4257-4268.
  33. Reinhardt JW. Side-effects: Mercury contribution to body burden from dental amalgam. Adv Dent Res. 1992; 6(1):110-3.
  34. Björkman L, sandborgh-Englund G, Ekstrand J. Mercury in saliva and feces after removal of amalgam fillings. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1997; 144(1):156-62.
  35. Stock A, Cucuel F. Der Quecksibergehalt der menschlichen Aussecheidungen und des menschlichen Blutes. Angewandte Chemie. 1934; 47(37):641-647.
  36. Frykholm KO. On Mercury from Dental Amalgam: Its Toxic and Allergic Effects, and Some Comments on Occupational Hygiene. Almqvist & Wiksells boktr.; 1957.
  37. Stortebecker P. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam –a Hazard to Human Brain. Orlando, FL: Bio- Prode, Inc.; 1985:32-43.
  38. Mercury: Human Exposure. United States Environmental Protection Agency Website. http://www.epa.gov/hg/exposure.htm. Updated July 9, 2013.
  39. United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Environmental Protection Agency. What You Need to Know about Mercury in Fish and Shellfish [brochure EPA-832-R-04-005]. Washington, D.C.: FDA and EPA; March 2004. http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm110591.htm.
  40. Sellars WA, Sllars R, Liang L, Hefley JD. Methyl mercury in dental amalgams in the human mouth. Journal of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine. 1996; 6(1):33-36.
  41. Heintze U, Edwardsson S, Derand T, Birkhed D. Methylation of mercury from dental amalgam and mercuric chloride by oral streptococci in vitro. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1983; 91(2):150-152.
  42. Wang J, Liu Z. In vitro study of streptococcus mutans in the plaque on the surface of amalgam fillings on the conversion of inorganic mercury to organic mercury. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2002; 9(2):70-72.
  43. Leistevuo J, Leistevuo T, Helenius H, Pyy L, Österblad M, Huovinen P, Tenovuo. Dental amalgam fillings and the amount of organic mercury in human saliva. Caries Research. 2001; 35(3):163-166.
  44. Rowland IR, Grasso P, Davies MJ. The methylation of mercuric chloride by human intestinal bacteria. Cellular and Molecular Life Science. 1975; 31(9):1064-5.
  45. Yannai S, Berdicevsky I, Duek L. Transformations of inorganic mercury by candida albicans and saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1991; 57(1):245-247.
  46. Summers AO, Wireman J, Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL, Marshall B, Levy SB, Billard L. Mercury released from dental “silver” fillings provokes an increase in mercury- and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in oral and intestinal chemotherapy. 1993; 37(4):825-834.
  47. Schriever W, Diamond LE. Electromotive forces and electric currents caused by metallic dental fillings. J Dent Res. 1952. 31(2):205-228.
  48. Schneider PE, Sarker NK. Mercury release from dispersalloy amalgam. IADR Abstract #630. 1982.
  49. Philips R.W. Skinner’s Science of Dental Materials (7th ed). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co., 1973.
  50. Pigatto PDM, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Guzzi G. Systemic Allergic Contact dermatitis due to galvanic couple between mercury amalgam and titanium implant. Skin Allergy Meeting. 2010.
  51. Hyams BL, Ballon HC. Dissimilar metals in the mouth as a possible cause of otherwise unexplainable symptoms. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1933; 29(5):488.
  52. Richardson GM, Brecher RW, Scobie H, Hamblen J, Samuelian J, Smith C. Mercury vapour (Hg(0)): Continuing toxicological uncertainties, and establishing a Canadian reference exposure level. Regul Toxicol Pharmicol. 2009; 53(1):32-38.
  53. Mutter J, Nauman J, Walach H, Daschner F. Amalgam risk assessment with coverage of references up to 2005. Gesundheitswesen. 2005; 67(3):2004-216.
  54. Advisory Committee on Mercury Pollution. Dental Amalgam Fillings: Environmental and Health Facts for Dental Patients [brochure]. Waterbury, Vermont: Mercury Education and Reduction Campaign. http://www.mercvt.org/PDF/DentalAmalgamFactSheet.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2013.
  55. Maine Bureau of Health. Fillings Materials [brochure]. Augusta, ME: Bureau of Health, 2002. http://www.vce.org/mercury/Maine_AmalBrochFinal2.pdf
  56. State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. Fillings: The Choices You Have: Mercury Amalgam and Other Filling Materials [brochure]. Hartford, CT: DEP; May 2011. http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/mercury/gen_info/fillings_brochure.pdf.
  57. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Clinical science intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam. J Den Res. 1985; 64(8):1069-71.
  58. Watson, Diane, and 18 other members of Congress. Dear Acting Commissioner Dr. Joshua Sharfstein… [Congressional letter]. Washington, D.C.: May 14, 2009. Copy of letter available upon request to john.donnelly@mail.house.gov.
  59. Watson, Diane (Congresswoman). Mercury in Dental Filling Disclosure and Prohibition Act. Los Angeles, CA: November 5, 2001. Copy of Act of available at http://amalgamillness.com/Text_DCAct.html.
  60. Palkovicova L, Ursinyova M, Masanova V, Yu Z, Hertz-Picciotto I. Maternal amalgam dental fillings as the source of mercury exposure in developing fetus and newborn. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008; 18(3):326-31.
  61. Lutz E, Lind B, Herin P, Krakau I, Bui TH, Vahter M. Concentrations of mercury, cadmium and lead in brain and kidney of second trimester fetuses and infants. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 1996; 10(2):61-7.
  62. Geier DA, Kern JK, Geier MR. A prospective study of prenatal mercury exposure from dental amalgam and autism severity. Neurobiolgiae Experimentals Polish Neuroscience Society. 2009; 69(2):189-197.
  63. Ask K, Akesson A, Berglund M, Vahter M. Inorganic mercury and methylmercury in placentas of Swedish women. Environ Health Perspect 2002; 110(5):523-6.
  64. Vahter M, Akesson A, Lind B, Bjors U, Schutz A, Berglund M. Longitudinal study of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in blood and urine of pregnant and lactating women, as well as in umbilical cord blood. Environ Res. 2000; 84(2):186-94.
  65. da Costa SL, Malm O, Dórea JG. Breast-milk mercury concentrations and amalgam surface in mothers from Brasilia, Brazil. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2005; 106(2):145-51.
  66. Oskarsson A, Schutz A, Schkerving S, Hallen IP, Ohlin B, Lagerkvist BJ. Total and inorganic mercury in breast milk in relation to fist consumption and amalgam in lactating women. Arch Environ Health. 1996; 51(3):234-51.
  67. Nourouzi E, Bahramifar N, Ghasempouri SM. Effect of teeth amalgam on mercury levels in the colostrums human milk in Lenjan. Environ Monit Assess. 2012; 184(1):375-380.
  68. Geier DA, Carmody T, Kern JK, King PG, Geier MR. A dose-dependent relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and urinary mercury levels: a further assessment of the Casa Pia Children’s Dental Amalgam Trial. Human & experimental toxicology. 2012; 31(1):11-17.
  69. Geier DA, Carmody T. Kern JK, King PG, Geier MR. A significant relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and urinary porphyrins: a further assessment of the Casa Pia children’s dental amalgam trial. Biometals. 2011; 24, (2):215-224.
  70. Woods JS, Heyer NJ, Echeverria D, Russo JE, Martin MD, Bernardo MF, Luis HS, Vaz L, Farin FM. Modification of neurobehavioral effects of mercury by a genetic polymorphism of coproporphyrinogen oxidase in children. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2012: 34(5):513-21.
  71. Al-Saleh I, Al-Sedairi A. Mercury (Hg) burden in children: The impact of dental amalgam. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 409(16):3003-3015.
  72. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg G; Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, McKinlay S. Neuropyschological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 295(15):1775-1783.
  73. DeRouen TA, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Townes BD, Woods JS, Leitão J, Castro-Caldas A, et al. Neurobehaviroral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 295(15):1784-1972.
  74. Roberts, Allison. Portugal shamed by child sex case. Sunday Herald. October 12, 2003.
  75. Duffy S. Critique of the Children’s Amalgam Study Consent Forms (American forms and Portuguese forms). IAOMT Web site. http://iaomt.guiadmin.com/wp-content/uploads/CAT_Duffy_legal_critique.pdf. Written June 16, 2004. Accessed August 25, 2013.
  76. Haley, BE. Response to the NIDCR Funded Children’s Amalgam Testing publications in the JAMA 2006. IAOMT Web site. http://iaomt.guiadmin.com/wp-content/uploads/CAT_Haley_scientific_critique.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2013.
  77. Geier DA, Carmody T, Kern JK, King PG, Geier MR. A significant relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and urinary porphyrins: a further assessment of the Casa Pia children’s dental amalgam trial. Biometals. 2011; 24, (2):215-224.
  78. United States of America Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health Medical Devices Committee. Dental Products Panel [transcript]. December 15, 2010: 271. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/committeesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/Medical/DevicesAdvisoryCommittee/DentalProductsPanel/UCM242363.pdf
  79. Health and Environment Alliance. Mercury and Dental Amalgams [fact sheet]. Brussels, Belgium: Health and Environment Alliance and Health Care without Harm; May 2007: 3. http://www.env-health.org/IMG/pdf/HEA_009-07.pdf.
  80. Richardson GM. Inhalation of mercury-contaminated particulate matter by dentists: an overlooked occupational risk. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 2003; 9(6):1519-1531.
  81. Nimmo A, Werley MS, Marin JS, Tansy MF. Particulate inhalation during the removal of amalgam restorations. J Prosth Dent. 1990; 93(2):228-33.
  82. Sikorski R, Juszkiewicz T, Paszhowski T, Szprengier-Juszkiewicz T. Women in dental surgeries: reproductive hazards in exposure to metallic mercury. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 1987; 59(6):551-557.
  83. Rowland AS, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Shore DL, Shy CM, Wilcox AJ. The effect of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the fertility of female dental assistants. Occupat Environ Med. 1994; 51:28-34.
  84. Buchwald H. Exposure of dental workers to mercury. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1972; 33(7):492-502.
  85. International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology. Amalgam-Mercury Fact Sheet. IAOMT Web site: http://iaomt.guiadmin.com/wp-content/uploads/IAOMT-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Published August 5, 2011. Accessed August 25, 2013.
  86. Finne KAJ, Göansson K, Winckler L. Oral lichen planus and contact allergy to mercury. International journal of oral surgery. 1982; 11(4):236-239.
  87. Tomka M, Machovkova A, Pelclova D, Petanova J, Arenbergeroca M, Prochazkova J. Orofacial granulomatosis associated with hypersensitivity to dental amalgam. Science Direct. 2011; 112(3):335-341.
  88. Lundstrom, IM. Allergy and corrosion of dental materials in patients with oral lichen planus. Int J Oral Surg. 1984; 13(1):16.
  89. Laine, J, Kalimo K, Forssell H, Happonen R. Resolution of oral lichenoid lesions after replacement of amalgam restorations in patients allergic to mercury compounds. JAMA. 1992; 267(21):2880.
  90. Lind PO, Hurlen B, Lyberg T, Aas E. Amalgam-related oral lichenoid reaction. Scand J Dent Res. 1986; 94(5):448-51.
  91. Pang BK, Freeman S. Oral lichenoid Lesions caused by allergy to mercury in amalgam fillings. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 33(6):423-7.
  92. White RR, Brandt RL. Development of mercury hypersensitivity among dental students. JADA. 1976; 92(6):1204-7.
  93. Godfrey ME, Wojcik DP, Krone CA. Apolipoprotein E genotyping as a potential biomarker for mercury toxicity. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2003; 5(3):189-195.
  94. Haley BE. Mercury toxicity: genetic susceptibility and synergistic effects. Medical Vertias. 2005; 2(2):535-542.
  95. Echeverria D, Woods JS, Heyer NJ, Rohlman D, Farin F, Li T, Garabedian CE. The association between a genetic polymorphism of coproporphyrinogen oxidase, dental mercury exposure and neurobehavioral response in humans. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006; 28(1):39-48.
  96. Woods JS, Heyer NJ, Exheverria D, Russo JE, Martin MD, Bernardo MF, Luis HS, Vaz L, Farin FM. Modification of neurobehavioral effects of mercury by a genetic polymorphism of coproporphyrinogen oxidase in children. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2012; 34(5):513-21.
  97. EcheverriaD, Woods JS, Heyer MJ, Rohlman D, Farin FM. Li T, Garabedian CE. The association between a genetic polymorphism of coproporphyrinogen oxidase, dental mercury exposure and neurobehavioral response in humans. Neurotoxicology and teratology. 2006; 28(1):39-48.
  98. Godfrey ME, Wojcik DP, Krone CA. Apolipoprotein E genotyping as a potential biomarker for mercury toxicity. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2003; 5(3):189-195.
  99. Redhe O, Pleva J. Recovery of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and from allergy after removal of dental amalgam fillings. Int J Risk & Safety in Med. 1994; 4(3):229-236.
  100. Summers AO, Wireman J, Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL, Marshall B, Levy SB, Billard L. Mercury released from dental “silver” fillings provokes an increase in mercury-and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in oral and intestinal floras of primates. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1993; 37(4):825-834.
  101. Geier DA, Kern JK, Geier MR. A prospective study of prenatal mercury exposure from dental amalgams and autism severity. Neurobiolgiae Experimentals Polish Neuroscience Society. 2009; 69(2):189-197.
  102. Laks DR. Environmental Mercury Exposure and the Risk of Autism [white paper]. Coalition for Safe Minds; August 27, 2008.
  103. Geier DA, Kern JK, Geier MR. The biological basis of autism spectrum disorders: Understanding causation and treatment by clinical geneticists. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2010; 70(2): 209-226.
  104. Bartova J, Prochazkova J, Kratka Z, Benetkova K, Venclikova C, Sterzl I. Dental amalgam as one of the risk factors in autoimmune disease. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2003; 24(1-2):65-67.
  105. Prochazkoca J, Sterzl I, Kucerkova H, Bartova J, Stejskal VDM. The beneficial effect of amalgam replacement on health in patients with autoimmunity. Neuroendocrinology Lett. 2004; 25(3):211-218.
  106. Sterzl I, Prochazkova J, Hrda P, Matucha P, Stejskal V.D. Mercury and nickel allergy: risk factors in fatigue and autoimmunity. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 1999; 20(3-4):221-228.
  107. Sibleud RL. The relationship between mercury from dental amalgam and the cardiovascular system. Science of the Total Environment. 1990:99(1-2):23-35.
  108. Stejskal I, Danersund A, Lindvall A, Hudecek R, Nordman V, Yaqob A, Mayer W, Bieger W, Lindh U. Metal-specific lymphocytes: biomarkers of sensitivity in man. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 1999; 20(5):289-298.
  109. Wojcik DP, Godfrey ME, Christie D, Haley BE. Mercury toxicity presenting as chronic fatigue, memory impairment and epression: diagnosis, treatment, susceptibility, and outcomes in a New Zealand general practice setting: 1994-2006. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006; 27(4):415-423.
  110. Hanson M. Health and amalgam removal: a meta-analysis of 25 studies. Tf-blader Bull of the Swedish Association of Dental Mercury Patients. Tf-bladet no. 2 2004 and SOU 2003:53 appendix 10, Sw. Dept. of Health: 204-216.
  111. Sjursen TT, Lygre GM, Dalen K, Helland V, Laegreid T, Scahn J, Lundekvam BF, Björkman L. Changes in health complaints after removal of amalgam fillings. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2011; 38(11): 835-848.
  112. Zamm A. Dental mercury: a factor that aggravates and induces xenobiotic intolerance. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine. 1991; (6)2.
  113. Hanson M, Pleva J. The dental amalgam issue: a review. Experientia. 1991; 47(1):9-22.
  114. Rothwell JA, Boyd PJ. Amalgam dental fillings and hearing loss. Int. J. Audiol. December 2008; 47(12):770-776.
  115. Barregard L, Fabricius-Lagging E, Lundh T, Molne J, Wallin M, Olausson M, Modigh C, Sallsten G. Cadmium, mercury, and lead in kidney cortex of living kidney donors: impact of different exposure sources. Environ Res. 2010; 110(1):47-54.
  116. Nylander M., Friberg L, Lind B. Mercury concentrations in the human brain and kidneys in relation to exposure form dental amalgam fillings. Swed Dent J. 1987; 11(5):179-187.
  117. Mortada WL, Sobh MA, El-Defrawi, Mm, Farahat SE. Mercury in dental restoration: is there a risk of nephrotoxity? J Nephrol. 2002; 15(2):171-176.
  118. Reinhardt JW. Side-effects: Mercury contribution to body burden from dental amalgam. Adv Dent Res. 1992; 6(1):110-3.
  119. Ely JTA, Fudenberg HH, Muirhead RJ, LaMarche MG, Krone CA, Buscher D, Stern EA, Urine Mercury in Micromercurialism: Bimodal Distribution and Diagnostic Implications. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.1999; 63(5):553-559.
  120. Siblerud RL. A comparison of mental health of multiple sclerosis patients with silver/mercury dental fillings and those with fillings removed. Psychol Rep. 1992; 70(3pt 2):1136-51.
  121. Huggins HA, Levy TE. Cerebrospinal fluid protein changes in multiple sclerosis after dental amalgam removal. Altern Med Rev. August 1998; 3(4):295-300.
  122. Siblerud RL, Kienholz E. Evidence that mercury from silver dental fillings may be an etiological factor in multiple sclerosis. The Science of the Total Environment. 1994; 142(3):191-205.
  123. Laine J, Kalimo K, Forssell H, Happonen R. Resolution of oral lichenoid lesions after replacement of amalgam restorations in patients allergic to mercury compounds. JAMA. 1992; 267(21):2880.
  124. Lind PO, Hurlen B, Lyberg T, Aas E. Amalgam-related oral lichenoid reaction. Scand J Dent Res. 1986; 94(5):448-51.
  125. Henriksson E, Mattsson U, Håkansson J. Healing of lichenoid reactions following removal of amalgam A clinical follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 1995; 22(4):287-94.
  126. Pang BK, Freeman S. Oral lichenoid lesions caused by allergy to mercury in amalgam fillings. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 33(6):423-7.
  127. Ibbotson SH, Speight EL, Macleod RI, Smart ER, Lawrence CM. The relevance and effect of amalgam replacement in subjects with oral lichenoid reactions. British Journal of Dermatology. 1996; 134(3):420-423.
  128. Dunsche A, Kastel I, Terheyden H, Springer ING, Christopher E, Brasch J. Oral lichenoid reactions associated with amalgam: improvement after amalgam removal. British Journal of Dermatology. 2003; 148(1):70-76.
  129. Finne KAJ, Göransson K, Winckler L. Oral Lichen planus and contact allergy to mercury. International journal of oral surgery. 1982; 11(4):236-239.
  130. Lundstrom, IM. Allergy and corrosion of dental materials in patients with oral lichen planus. Int J Oral Surg. 1984; 13(1):16.
  131. Mutter J. Is dental amalgam safe for humans? The opinion of the scientific committee of the European Commission. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2011; 6:2.
  132. Goldschmidt PR, Cogan RB, Taubman RB, Taubman SB. Effects of amalgam corrosion products on human cells. J Period Res. 1976; 11(2):108-15.
  133. Ziff MF. Documented side effects of dental amalgam. ADR. 1992; 6(1):131-134.
  134. Rowland AS, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Shore DL, Shy CM, Wilcox AJ. The effect of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the fertility of female dental assistants. Occupat Environ Med. 1994; 51:28-34.
  135. Sikoroski R, Juszkiewicz T, Paszkowski T. Szprengier-Juszkiewicz T. Women in dental surgeries: reproductive hazards in exposure to metallic mercury. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 1987; 59(6):551-557.
  136. Wojcik DP, Godfrey ME, Christie D, Haley BE. Mercury toxicity presenting as chronic fatigue, memory impairment and depression: diagnosis, treatment, susceptibility, and outcomes in a New Zealand general practice setting: 1994-2006. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006; 27(4):415-423.
  137. Raymond LJ, Ralston NVC. Mercury: selenium interactions and health complications. Seychelles Medical and Dental Journal. 2004; 7(1): 72-77.
  138. Haley BE. Mercury toxicity: genetic susceptibility and synergistic effects. Medical Vertias. 2005; 2(2): 535-542.
  139. Haley BE. The relationship of the toxic effects of mercury to exacerbation of the medical condition classified as Alzheimer’s disease. Medical Veritas. 2007; 4(2):1510-1524.
  140. Ingalls TH. Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of multiple sclerosis. Hypothesis and fact. Am J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 1983; 4(1):55-61.
  141. Schubert J, Riley EJ, Tyler SA. Combined effects in toxicology—a rapid systematic testing procedure: Cadmium, mercury, and lead. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A Current Issues. 1978; 4(5-6):763-776.
  142. Mata L, Sanchez L, Calvo, M. Interaction of mercury with human and bovine milk proteins. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1997; 61(10):1641-4.
  143. Kostial K, Rabar I, Ciganovic M, Simonovic I. Effect of milk on mercury absorption and gut retention in rats. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 1979; 23(1): 566-571.
  144. Hursh JB, Greenwood MR, Clarkson TW, Allen J, Demuth S. The effect of ethanol on the fate of mercury inhaled by man. JPET. 1980; 214(3):520-527.
  145. Hanson M. 258 symptoms of mercury toxicity and 12000 mercury citations. Mercury Bibliography (3rd edition). Orlando, FL: Bio-Probe; 1992.
  146. von Oettingen WF. Poisoning: A guide to Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 1960; 240(3):401.
  147. International Programme on Chemical Safety. Environmental Health Criteria 1: Mercury. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environment Programme and World Health Organization, 1976. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc001.htm.
  148. Sugita M. The biological half-time of heavy metals. The existence of a third slowest component. Int Arch Occup Health. 1978; 41(1):25-40.
  149. 94th U.S. Congress. H.R. 11124: Medical Device Amendments. U.S. House of Representative Bill Summary & Status. December 11, 1975.
  150. United States Food and Drug Administration. 45 FR 85962 at 85964. Federal Register. December 30, 1980.
  151. United States Food and Drug Administration. 52 FR 30082. Federal Register. August 12, 1987.
  152. United States Food and Drug Administration. FR63(77):19799-19802. Federal Register. April 22, 1988.
  153. FDAnews, FDA to classify mercury fillings by summer 2009. Daily Device Bulletin. June 17, 2008; 5(118):1. http://www.fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=11684&articled=107723.
  154. United States Food and Drug Administration. Joint Meeting of the Dental Products Panel (CDRH) and the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee (CDER). September 6-7, 2006. http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetinMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommettee/DentalProductsPanel/ucm125150.htm.
  155. FDAnews. FDA to classify mercury fillings by summer 2009. Daily Device Bulletin. June 17, 2008. 5(118):1. http://www.fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=11684&articleId=107723
  156. United States Food and Drug Administration. Press Announcements: FDA Issues Final Regulation on Dental Amalgam [press release]. July 28, 2009. http://www/fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/Pressannouncements/ucm173992.htm.
  157. United States Food and Drug Administration. Dental Devices: Classification of dental Amalgam, Reclassification of Dental Mercury, Designation of Special Controls for Dental Amalgam, Mercury, and Amalgam Alloy. 2009. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Medicaldevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DentalProducts/DentalAmalgam/UCM174024.pdf.
  158. United States Food and Drug Administration. Addendum to the Dental Amalgam White Paper: Response to 2006 Joint Advisory Panel Comments and Recommendations. July 2009. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/productsandomedicalprocedures/dentalproducts/dentelamalgam/ucm173908.pdf.
  159. Associated Press. Warning issued for silver dental fillings. USA Today. 6/12/2008.
  160. Love JM, Reeves RE. Petition for Reconsideration, hereby request that the Food & Drug Administration reconsider the classification of dental amalgam fillings into Class II per the FDA’s August 4, 2009, Final Rule [petition]. Champion’s Gate, FL: IAOMT; Sep. 3, 2009.
  161. United States of America Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health Medical devices Committee. Dental Products Panel [transcript]. December 15, 2010. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/DentalProductsPanel/UCM242363.pdf.
  162. Randall™. Jeffrey Shuren, director of FDA’s CDRH, will make end year (2011) announcement on dental amalgam. [Video Footage from FDA Townhall Meeting in California.] Uploaded January 8, 2012 by Mercury Exposure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2t0J2_1yr0.
  163. Health Canada. The Safety of Dental Amalgam. Ottowa, Ontario: Minister of Health; 1996.
  164. National Institute of Dental Research. National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) Workshop on the biocompatibility of metals in dentistry. JADA. 1984; 109:169-171.
  165. American Dental Association. When your patients ask about mercury in amalgam. JADA. 1990; 120:395-8.
  166. American Dental Association. Dental amalgam and other restorative materials: Advisory opinion 5. A. 1, American Dental Association Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct. Revised April 2002.
  167. Chirba-Marin M. Welshhans C. An uncertain risk and an uncertain future: assessing the legal implications of mercury amalgam fillings. Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine. 2004; 14:293-324.
  168. Legal brief filed in W.H. Tolhurst vs. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc; Engelhard Corp,; ABE Dental Inc.; The American Dental Association, et al. In the Superior Court of the State of California, In and For the Country of Santa Clara. Case No. 718228. 1995.
  169. ADA Seal of Acceptance Program & Products. American Dental Association Web Site. http://www.ada.org/sealprogramproducts.aspx. Accessed August 27, 2013.
  170. Pyle, Amy. A debate on mercury in fillings. Los Angeles Times. October 25, 1999. http://articles.latimes.com/1999/oct/25/news/mn-26046
  171. CBS. Is there poison in your mouth? 60 Minutes. December 16, 1990.
  172. Sehnert KW, Jacobson G, Sullivan K. Is mercury toxicity an autoimmune disorder? Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patietns. (1999):100-103.
  173. CBS Television Distribution. Dangerous toxins. The Doctors. January 3, 2013. http://www.thedoctorstv.com/main/show_synopsis/1195?section=synopsis
  174. CBS Television Distribution. Dangerous Toxins. The Doctors. January 3, 2013. http://www.thedoctorstv.com/videolib/init/8092
  175. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Clinical science intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam. J Den Res. 1985; 64(8):1069-71.
  176. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider Fl. Serial measurements of intra-oral air mercury: estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam. J Dent Res. 1985; 64(8):1072-5.
  177. Hahn LJ, Kloiber R, Vimy MJ, Takahashi Y, Lorschedier F. Dental “silver” tooth fillings a source of mercury exposure revealed by whole-body image scan and tissue analysis. FASEB J. 1989; 3(14):2641-2646.
  178. Harpo, Inc. Are you silver fillings making you sick? The Dr. Oz Show. March 28, 2013. http://www.doctoroz.com/episode/are-your-silver-fillings-making-you-sick?video=18041
  179. American Dental Association. American Dental Association Objects to the Dr. Oz show segment on dental amalgam [press release]. Chicago, Illinois American Dental Association. March 28, 2013. http://www.ada.org/8448.aspx.
  180. Dental Filling Facts. American Dental Association Web site. http://www.ada.org/sections/publicResouces/pdfs/dental_fillings_facts_abstract.pdf. Accessed August 28, 2013.
  181. Begerow J. Long term urinary platinum, palladium, and gold excretion of patients after insertion of noble metal dental alloys. Biomarkers. 1999; 4(1):27-36.
  182. Smith DC, Williams DF. Biocompatibility of dental Materials. Vol III: Biocompatibility of Dental Restorative Materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.; 1982.
  183. Wyman RJ. The Posterior Composite Resin Restoration. Winning at Restorative Dentistry without Mercury. Toronto, Canada: Maxplax: 1984.
  184. Richardson GM. An assessment of adult exposure and risks from components and degradation products of composite resin dental materials. Human Ecolog Risk Assessment. 1997; 3(4):683-697.
  185. Richardson GM, Clark KE, Williams DR. Preliminary estimates of adult exposure to bisphenol-a from dental materials, food and ambient air. ASTM SPECIAL TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. 1999; 1364:286-304.
  186. Richardson GM. Assessment of exposure and risks from components and degredation products of composite resin dental materials. IAOMT. 1996.
  187. Richardson GM. Mercury exposure and risks from dental amalgam in Canada: The Canadian Health Measures Survey 2007-2009. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 2012.
  188. McCracken MS, Gordon VV, Litaker MS, Funkhouser E, Fellows JL, SHamp DG, Qvist V, Meral JS, Gilbert GH. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2013; 144(6):583-593.
  189. Laccabue M, Ahlf RL, Simecek JW. Frequency of Restoration Replacement in Posterior Teeth for US Navy and Marine Corps Personnel. Operative dentistry. 2013.
  190. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct Class II restorations—a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14(5):407-431.
  191. Davidovich E, Weiss E, Fuks AB, Beyth N. Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2007; 138(10): 1347.
  192. Lopez N, Simpser-Rafalin S, Berthold P. Atraumatic restorative treatment for prevention and treatment of caries in an underserved community. American journal of public health. 2005; 95(8): 1338-1339.
  193. World Health Organization. Future Use of Materials for Dental Restoration: Report of the Meeting Concerned at WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, November 2009.
  194. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct Class II restorations—a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(5):407-431.
  195. Lindqvist B, Mörnstad H. Effects of removing amalgam fillings from patient with diseases affecting the immune system. Medical Science Research. May 1996; 24(5):355-356.
  196. Siblerud RL. A comparison of mental health of multiple sclerosis patients with silver/mercury dental dillings and those with fillings removed. Psychol Rep. 1992; 70(3pt 2):1136-51.
  197. Huggins HA, Levy TE. Cerebrospinal fluid protein changes in multiple sclerosis after dental amalgam removal. Altern Med Rev. 1998; 3(4):295-300.
  198. Siblerud RL, Kienholz E. Evidence that mercury from silver dental fillings may be an etiological factor in multiple sclerosis. The Science of the Total Environment. 1994; 142(3):191-205.
  199. Redhe O, Pleva J. Recovery of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and from allergy after removal of dental amalgam fillings. Int J Risk & safety in Med. 1994; 4(3):229-236.
  200. Prochazkova J, Sterzl I, Kucerkova H, Bartova J, Stejskal VDM. The beneficial effect of amalgam replacement on health in patient with autoimmunity. Neuroendocrinology Lett. 2004; 25(3):211-218.
  201. Zamm AV. Candida albicans therapy. Is there ever an end to it? Dental mercury removal: an effective adjunct. J Orthomol. Med. 1986; 1(4): 261-266.
  202. Sjursen TT, Lygre GM, Dalen K, Helland V, Laegreid T, Svahn J, Lundekvam BF, Björkman L. Changes in health complaints after removal of amalgam fillings. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2011;38(11):835-848.
  203. Wojcik DP, Godfrey ME, Christie D, Haley BE. Mercury toxicity presenting as chronic fatigue, memory impairment and depression: diagnosis, treatment, susceptibility, and outcomes in a New Zealand general practice setting: 1994-2006. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006; 27(4): 415-423.
  204. Laine J, Kalimo K, Forssell H, Happonen R. Resolution of oral lichenoid lesions after replacement of amalgam restorations in patients allergic to mercury compounds. JAMA. 1992; 267(21):2880.
  205. Fleming M and Janosky J. The Economics of Dental Amalgam Regulation. Report Submitted fro Review and Publication to “Public Health Reports. Available online at http://iaomt.guiadmin.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Economics-of-Dental-Amalgam-Regulation.pdf.
  206. Maryniuk GA. In search of treatment longevity – A 30 year perspective. JADA. 1984; 109(5):739-744.
  207. Walls AWG, Wallwork MA, Holland IS, and Murray JJ. The longevity of occlusal amalgam restorations in first permanent molars of child patients. Br. Dent J. 1985; 158(4):133-136.
  208. Rom WN, Ed. Environmental and Occupational Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co. 1983:461.
  209. Sears ME, Kerr KJ, Bray RI. Arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury in sweat: a systematic review. Journal of environmental and public health. 2012.
  210. Stejskal VDM, Cederbrant K, Lindvall A, Forsbeck M. MELISA—an in vitro tool for the study of metal allergy. Toxicology in vitro. 1994; 8(5):991-1000.
  211. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs; ADA Council on Dental Benefit Programs. Statement on posterior Resin based composites. JADA. 1998; 129(11):1627-8.
  212. McGrath K. A Toxic Mouthful: the Misalignment of Dental Mercury Regulations. B. C. J. L. & Soc. Just. 2013; 33(2):347. http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/jlsj/vol33/iss2/4
  213. United Nations Environment Programme. Minamata Convention on Mercury. Geneva, Switzerland: Text agreed upon in UNEP(DTIE)/Hg/INC.5/3; January 13-19, 2013. http://www.mercuryconvention.org/Portals/11/documents/conventionText/Minamata%20Convention%20on%20Mercury_e.pdf
  214. Informed Consent. American Medical Association Web site. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/legal-topics/patient-physician-relationship-topics/informed-consent.page. Accessed August 28, 2013.
  215. Dental Board of California. The Facts about Fillings [fact sheet]. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Consumer Affairs; 5/04. http://www.dbc.ca.gov/formspubs/pub_dmfs_english_webview.pdf.
  216. State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. Fillings: The Choices You Have: Mercury Amalgam and Other Filling Materials [brochure]. Hartford, CT: DEP; May 2011. http://www.ct.gov/dep/lib/dep/mercury/gen_infor/fillings_brochure.pdf.
  217. Maine Burea of Health. Filling Materials [brochure]. Augusta, ME: Bureau of Health, 2002. http://vce.org/mercury/Maine_AmalBrochFinal2.pdf
  218. Advisory Committee on Mercury Pollution. Dental Amalgam Fillings: Environmental and Health Facts for Dental Patients [brochure]. Waterbury, Vermont: Mercury Education and Reduction Campaign. http://www.mercvt.org/PDF/DentalAmalgamFactSheet.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2013.